Final answer:
The debate on human origins between Dr. Leo and Dr. Wertz illustrates the strong consensus among the scientific community regarding evolution and the scientific method. This consensus is based on experimental evidence and peer review, with 97% of scientists acknowledging the validity of evolutionary theory, regardless of the contrarian views held by some from non-biological disciplines or the public.
Step-by-step explanation:
The debate between Dr. Leo and Dr. Wertz at a conference about human origins touches on an ongoing discussion within the scientific community and between scientific and non-scientific perspectives. The argument that evolution is still controversial among biologists is counteracted by evidence such as the strong consensus among the scientific community, with 97% of polled scientists affirming the theory of evolution, as reflected by polls like the one conducted by Pew Research in 2009. This agreement is further underscored by support from reputable scientific societies, such as the American Association for the Advancement of Science.
The discussion also opens up broader themes regarding the history of scientific inquiry, back to when the Renaissance rekindled the spirit of rational questioning and scientific research. Subsequent periods in history, including the modern period, have seen a preference for the scientific method and the questioning of a priori reasoning, reflecting a shift towards naturalism over supernaturalism in understanding nature.
Despite the strong consensus within biology, some scientists from other disciplines and the general public may still reject or question evolution. Science is guided by experimental evidence, peer-reviewed research, and the ability to challenge orthodoxy with new ideas. In the absence of solid evidence against evolution, the scientific method dictates that the theory stands robust.