Final answer:
George Herbert Mead would interpret streaking at a graduation ceremony as an act that challenges social norms, reflects the individual's assertion of identity, and is influenced by the societal responses per his theory of social behaviorism.
Step-by-step explanation:
From the perspective of George Herbert Mead's social behaviorism, streaking during a graduation ceremony can be understood as an act that challenges the conventional symbols and meanings associated with the solemnity and decorum of such an event. Mead's theory suggests that individuals act based on the meanings that things have for them, which are derived through social interaction. In the context of social norms and the ceremony itself, streaking would be seen as an outward expression that counteracts the traditional values and expectations of behavior.
Moreover, such behavior might also reflect the concept of the 'Generalized Other,' which represents the societal expectations and attitudes internalized by individuals. Streaking at a graduation ceremony might indicate a transitional phase for the individual, symbolizing a departure from the institutionalized roles and a move towards asserting individuality.
In line with Charles Herbert Cooley's concept of the 'looking-glass self,' the reactions of the audience to streaking would be integral to how the individual perceives and evaluates their own actions. If the social response is negative, it could reinforce the social norms that deem streaking inappropriate. Conversely, if the response from peers is positive or encourages laughter, it could momentarily validate the behavior, despite societal norms.