Final answer:
The distinction between 'clean' and 'dirty' individuals in the 6th Street neighborhood likely stems from environmental and social factors, such as pollution and crime, associated with systemic inequality and environmental racism rather than personal cleanliness.
Step-by-step explanation:
The terms "clean" and "dirty" as used in the context of the 6th Street neighborhood likely refer to the social and environmental aspects of living conditions rather than personal hygiene. "Clean" individuals may imply those who reside in less polluted, less crime-ridden areas with better access to amenities and a higher quality of life. Conversely, "dirty" could refer to individuals living in environments with high poverty rates, environmental pollution, and exposure to criminal activities due to the legacy of racial and class segregation.
Environmental racism often leaves minority and economically disadvantaged communities trapped in "dirty" conditions, struggling with issues such as air and water pollution and industrial hazards, while wealthier, often ethnically homogenous neighborhoods, remain "clean". Vice activities, such as prostitution and gambling, are historically more tolerated in impoverished and minority neighborhoods, leading to a correlation with higher crime rates due to the environmental and social neglect these areas suffer from.
In summary, the distinction between "clean" and "dirty" persons is less about individual choices and more about the systemic issues of inequality, environmental injustice, and the historic tolerance of vice in certain areas, shaping the residents' living conditions and social standing.