Final answer:
There are four general approaches to explaining the difference between knowledge and merely true belief: strengthening the justification condition, adding a fourth condition, redefining knowledge, and revising the concept of justification.
Step-by-step explanation:
In response to this problem, philosophers have proposed various approaches to explaining the difference between knowledge and merely 'true belief.' Here are four general approaches:
- Strengthening the Justification Condition: This approach aims to redefine or clarify what counts as justification, making it more robust and reliable. By identifying and addressing the limitations of justification, philosophers hope to establish a stronger criterion for knowledge.
- Adding a Fourth Condition: Another solution to the Gettier problem is to add a fourth condition to the definition of knowledge. This additional condition would complement the three conditions of justified true belief and provide further criteria necessary for knowledge.
- Redefining Knowledge: Some philosophers question whether the traditional understanding of knowledge as justified true belief is the most accurate definition. They propose alternative definitions or frameworks that capture the essence of knowledge more accurately.
- Revising the Concept of Justification: This approach explores different conceptions of justification and seeks to refine the concept to address the limitations revealed by Gettier cases. By reevaluating how justification is understood, philosophers aim to better align it with our intuitions about what should count as knowledge.