Final answer:
An argument not against inter scholastic sports highlights the benefits such as the promotion of teamwork and competitive spirit, as well as the positive impact on students' physical health and academic performance. It also suggests that sports provide a healthy stress outlet and can improve study habits.
Step-by-step explanation:
What is NOT an argument AGAINST inter scholastic sports? An argument against the notion would typically highlight concerns such as distraction from academics, the risk of injury, or financial strains. However, an argument supporting inter scholastic sports might emphasize the positive impact on students, such as the promotion of teamwork, improved physical health, and the development of a competitive spirit that can be beneficial in life. Additionally, inter scholastic sports can foster community spirit and help students deal with the pressures of school by providing a healthy outlet for stress.
Regarding the academic performance of student athletes, there are studies suggesting that participation in sports can be associated with better study habits and possibly higher academic performance compared to non-athletes. This challenges the argument that inter scholastic sports are detrimental to a student's academic pursuits.
In the context of paying student athletes, colleges may see both benefits and drawbacks. However, it is not an argument against inter scholastic sports, but rather a consideration of how intercollegiate athletics are structured and funded. Paying student athletes might help in recruiting talented students and generating revenue through successful sports programs, but could also lead to a shift in the focus from education to profitability.