Final answer:
Stacey objects to feminist ethnography on the basis that it cannot fully eliminate the inherent power imbalances between researcher and subject. Despite feminist anthropology's intentions to mitigate biases and center women's perspectives, the fieldwork relationship still grapples with issues around equality and representation.
Step-by-step explanation:
Stacey argues against the idea of a feminist ethnography because she thinks that the fieldwork relationship is inherently unequal (c). This argument stems from the recognition that all research, including feminist ethnography, is conducted within existing power structures. As a sociological and anthropological concept, feminist ethnography aims to reflect women's experiences and perspectives, and by doing so, seeks to correct historical biases in research that have traditionally privileged male viewpoints. However, the challenge lies in the fact that the relationship between the researcher and those being studied cannot be entirely free from inequality or exploitation in practice. Researchers bring their own biases and perspectives to the field, which can shape the findings of their ethnography, despite attempts to be sensitive and inclusive.
An additional concern related to ethnographic work is that it may inadvertently perpetuate stereotypes or reflect the anthropologist's efforts to confirm preconceived notions about the people being studied. To combat these challenges, contemporary anthropologists often use innovative methods and collaborative practices in an effort to produce more ethical and representative ethnographic work, termed by Nancy Scheper-Hughes as 'good enough ethnography'.