Final answer:
Coffey & Atkinson critique the fragmentation of qualitative data through coding due to the loss of context and narrative, which are key to understanding the richness of qualitative research.
Step-by-step explanation:
Coffey & Atkinson are critical of the way coding fragments qualitative data because it results in a loss of context and narrative flow. When qualitative data is broken down into codes and categories, vital connections and the stories that give meaning to the data can be lost. This segmentation may lead to overlooking the complex interrelationships and the richness that narrative data holds, which is crucial for in-depth understanding in qualitative research, especially within the frameworks of symbolic interactionism and critical race and gender theory.