Final answer:
None of the provided options can be used to launch a man-in-the-middle attack against a web or mobile application.
The correct answer is d) None of the above.
Step-by-step explanation:
The correct answer is d) None of the above. None of the options mentioned can be used to launch a man-in-the-middle attack against a web or mobile application. Let me explain each option:
- Compromised ISP facility: While an attacker with access to the ISP facility may have the ability to intercept network traffic, it is not specifically targeted at a web or mobile application. A man-in-the-middle attack requires the attacker to intercept communication between the application and its intended server.
- Compromised WiFi router: A compromised WiFi router can allow an attacker to intercept network traffic, but again, it does not directly target a specific web or mobile application.
- Fake WiFi access point: A fake WiFi access point is a common method for executing a man-in-the-middle attack. However, this option specifically mentions that it cannot be used for a man-in-the-middle attack, so it is not a valid choice.
Therefore, the correct answer is d) None of the above as none of the options can be used to launch a man-in-the-middle attack against a web or mobile application.