Final answer:
The claim that all individuals in the military become riflemen is false; there are diverse roles in the military. Also, it's false that women were incapable of handling war burdens—many took on significant roles. Additionally, it is not always true that soldiers are well rewarded for their service, as history has shown varied outcomes.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that 'All men and women in the army become riflemen' is false. Various roles exist within the military, and not all individuals serve as riflemen. Furthermore, the claim that 'Many women found themselves incapable of handling the burdens of war when their husbands and fathers went off to fight' is also false. Historical evidence suggests that many women have stepped into various roles during times of war, taking on work, managing home fronts, and even serving in military capacities. For instance, during World War II, approximately 520,000 women were members of the field army in the Soviet Union, with 120,000 of them directly engaging the enemy as soldiers. This demonstrates the capacity and resilience of women in wartime. The concept of every soldier being pivotal in combat has also evolved with the advent of new technologies such as machine guns, which required teams for operation and significantly changed the nature of warfare. Additionally, rewards for soldiers have varied throughout history, and during some conflicts, such as the Revolutionary War, soldiers were often not 'well rewarded for their service,' which is an example where the statement in Section 8.4.6 - p363 would be false.