Final answer:
Humiliating, belittling, or frightening a child are actions that are typically prohibited because they can be psychologically damaging and may be legally classified as abuse. A symbolic interactionist would argue that such negative treatment impacts a child's self-concept and reinforces harmful social structures. Corporal punishment is also becoming less accepted due to its potential harm.
Step-by-step explanation:
Humiliating, belittling, or frightening a child are actions that are widely recognized to be harmful to a child's mental and emotional wellbeing, and in many cases, they are indeed prohibited by law and social service regulations. This form of treatment can constitute psychological abuse or emotional maltreatment, which negatively impacts a child's development. Not only are such actions ethically unacceptable, but they could also potentially lead to legal consequences for perpetrators. The effects of such treatment can echo into adulthood, leading to a range of psychological problems.
In a symbolic interactionist view, the language and interaction between individuals create social realities. Therefore, from this perspective, using negative language to address children teaches them to view themselves and their capabilities negatively, reinforcing harmful social structures and affecting their self-concept.
Corporal punishment, which is physical punishment, can also be controversial. While some physical discipline methods like spanking are not considered abuse under certain legal frameworks if no injury occurs, there is a growing consensus against the use of physical punishment due to the potential psychological harm and the risk of escalating violence.