Final answer:
The dangers of appealing to the view of the majority to justify control over an individual include tyranny, marginalization of minority groups, denial of civil liberties, and hindrance of progress and innovation.
Step-by-step explanation:
The dangers of appealing to the view of the majority in order to justify control over an individual through the force of dominant opinions are evident in the potential for tyranny. When the majority's opinions and beliefs are used as a basis for suppressing the rights and freedoms of individuals, it can lead to the marginalization and oppression of minority groups. This can result in the denial of civil liberties, discrimination, and unequal treatment.
For example, in the history of the United States, the majority's support for slavery was used to justify the control and subjugation of African Americans. The dominant opinion at the time believed that slavery was morally acceptable and that African Americans were inferior. This led to the widespread denial of their rights and their subordination to the will of the majority.
Additionally, appealing to the view of the majority can hinder progress and innovation by stifling dissenting opinions. If the majority opinion is taken as the ultimate truth, there is no room for alternative perspectives or critical thinking. This can result in a stagnant society that is resistant to change and new ideas.