Final Answer:
according to the definition of Omega notation.
Step-by-step explanation:
The definition of Omega notation requires proving that there exist positive constants
such that
for all
To demonstrate this, we can simplify the inequality by dividing both sides by
yielding

Now, let's choose
For all
the inequality holds:
This proves that
as per the definition.
The choice of
is essential in this proof. In this case, selecting
simplifies the proof, but it's crucial to note that various choices of constants are possible as long as they satisfy the definition of Omega notation.
The rationale behind the proof lies in demonstrating that the growth rate of
is at least as fast as
multiplied by a positive constant for sufficiently large
confirming the Omega relationship between the two functions.