209k views
2 votes
Consider the following code:

let rec exp x n =
if n = 0 then 1 else x * exp x (n-1)
let rec faster_exp x n =
if n = 0 then
1
else if n mod 2 = 0 then
faster_exp (x*x) (n/2)
else
x * faster_exp (x*x) (n/2)
Prove that forall natural numbers n and integers x, _____ = ___________

User Batbaatar
by
9.1k points

1 Answer

6 votes

Final answer:

For all natural numbers n and integers x, the functions exp x n and faster_exp x n both compute x^n. The exp function uses a direct recursive approach, while faster_exp employs exponentiation by squaring, which is more efficient. Hence, exp x n = faster_exp x n, as they both yield the same result, x raised to the power n.

Step-by-step explanation:

The student's question asks to prove that for all natural numbers n and integers x, the functions exp and faster_exp return the same results, which is x raised to the power n. To prove this, we need to show that both exp x n and faster_exp x n will compute x^n.

The exp function, defined recursively, represents the standard definition of exponentiation: x multiplied by itself n times. So, exp x n will essentially be x * x... (n times).

The faster_exp function, on the other hand, uses the property of exponents where x^(2k) = (x^2)^k to reduce the number of multiplications needed. This method is known as exponentiation by squaring and is more efficient. For odd powers, it factors out an x and then proceeds as if computing for an even power. Hence, faster_exp x n also calculates x^n, but does so more quickly.

In conclusion, we have shown that for all natural numbers n and integers x, exp x n = faster_exp x n because both functions will consistently result in x raised to the power n, demonstrating that exp x n and faster_exp x n are indeed equivalent implementations of exponentiation.

User Thedk
by
9.2k points