Final answer:
A trustee is guilty of embezzlement if they divert funds for an unauthorized purpose, regardless of personal gain, making the statement true. Embezzlement is an example of corporate crime, and the colonists were more concerned with the use of tax money rather than taxation itself. Proprietors in a proprietary colony had additional responsibilities beyond just collecting profits.
Step-by-step explanation:
If a trustee diverts funds for some unauthorized purpose, the situation is indeed considered embezzlement, even if the trustee does not personally gain from the diversion. This is because embezzlement is defined as the fraudulent taking of personal property by someone to whom it was entrusted. Therefore, the answer to the student's question is a. true.
As for the examples of corporate crime, embezzlement is a typical example. It involves the misappropriation of funds placed in one's trust or belonging to one's employer. Larceny is also a theft crime but generally involves property that wasn't directly entrusted to the perpetrator. Assault and burglary do not fall under the category of corporate crime as they are personal crimes against individuals or property crimes with no direct connection to the corporate environment.
The colonists' objection during the revolutionary era pertained more to the lack of representation and voice regarding how the tax money was spent, not the principle of taxation itself, making the statement a. true. In a proprietary colony, such as Pennsylvania, the proprietors had numerous responsibilities, including governance and development, so the statement that they only collected profits is b. false. The necessary and proper clause, rather than limiting the national government, has been used to expand its powers over time, rendering the statement b. false.