Final answer:
True, tactical communication is often a preferred and effective approach to conflict resolution instead of physical force. It involves emotional management and metacognition to de-escalate situations peacefully.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that tactical communication is a reasonable option instead of using physical force is true. When faced with conflict or potential violence, using tactical communication is often preferable and more effective than resorting immediately to physical force. This approach prioritizes using communication skills to de-escalate a situation, manage emotions, and achieve a peaceful resolution. While the context of managing a large or small army requires instituting signs and signals according to the provided reference, this principle is different in nature and should not be conflated with the use of tactical communication in de-escalation.
In essence, controlling one's emotions and reflecting upon them ('metacognition') plays a crucial role in effective tactical communication. Moreover, considering the ethical dilemmas surrounding the use of new weapons technology that allows for killing from a distance, as mentioned in the provided information, it further underlines the importance of weighing non-violent options such as communication before resorting to force.