Final answer:
Schulz and Goldstein argue that focusing solely on crime is insufficient as it is not the primary concern in waste management, which requires considering various factors beyond crime. Social disorganization theory posits that crime occurs where community bonds are weak, and the Love Canal Disaster involved improper chemical waste storage, leading to the creation of the Superfund.
Step-by-step explanation:
According to Schulz and Goldstein, the focus on crime is insufficient because crime is not the primary concern in waste management. The relationship between crime and waste management is complex, involving legal codes, biases, and social problems. Furthermore, criminal justice systems adopt a variety of approaches to reduce the costs of crime on society, including prevention, incarceration, rehabilitation, or restorative justice. The cost-benefit analysis can be used to determine the most effective method for crime reduction and does not focus solely on waste management issues. Therefore, the focus on crime alone is insufficient in discussing waste management; a broader perspective that includes environmental, health, and community impacts is necessary.
When discussing the social disorganization theory, crime is most likely to occur in a community where neighbors don't know each other very well. This emphasizes the importance of community bonds and social cohesion in preventing crime. Lastly, regarding the "Love Canal Disaster," all statements are true except for the implication that nothing was done correctly post-incident. It was indeed a disaster involving improper storage of chemical waste, and it led to the creation of the Superfund. Additionally, a school was built on the contaminated site, exacerbating the problem.