Question

In what context (of definitions) does Lele argue sustainable development can be contradictory or nonsensical?

a) When definitions are clear and universally accepted
b) In the absence of conflicting interpretations
c) When development and sustainability are seen as complementary
d) When different stakeholders have divergent views and goals

Answer 1

Lele argues that sustainable development can be contradictory or nonsensical when different stakeholders have divergent views and goals(option d).

Step-by-step explanation:

Lele argues that sustainable development can be contradictory or nonsensical when different stakeholders have divergent views and goals(option d).

This means that when different groups or individuals have conflicting interpretations and priorities regarding development and sustainability, it can lead to contradictions and confusion. For example, conservationists may argue for environmental regulations and protected areas, while others may contest their establishment and management. These conflicting views can make sustainable development challenging to define and achieve.