Question

Amy, a social reformer in the early 20th century, would have likely considered all of the following to be good reasons to push for secondary education, except:

a. Economic productivity
b. Social mobility
c. Gender equality
d. Preservation of child labor

Answer 1

Amy, as a social reformer of the early 20th century, would likely push for secondary education to improve economic productivity, social mobility, and gender equality, but not for the preservation of child labor, which she would have aimed to abolish.

Step-by-step explanation:

Amy, a social reformer in the early 20th century, would have likely considered all of the following to be good reasons to push for secondary education, except the preservation of child labor. Social reformers of the time worked to abolish conditions like child labor and instead promoted education as an important aspect for economic productivity, social mobility, and gender equality. Education reforms in the early 1900s aimed to eradicate the grim conditions of child labor and placed an emphasis on at least a primary school education for students.

The increase in education was believed to lead to positive outcomes like higher productivity, enhanced opportunities for individuals to improve their social standing, and greater equality across genders. These reforms were part of a broader movement by Progressives to improve living conditions, enact labor reforms, and enforce mandatory school attendance laws. Yet, the preservation of child labor would be contradictory to the education goals that reformers like Amy pursued, as it would keep children in the workforce instead of in schools.