Final answer:
Yes, according to the Single Responsibility Principle, a class with two responsibilities should be separated into different classes to promote clearer, more maintainable code. An example is separating a class that generates and emails reports into two distinct classes, each handling one responsibility.
Step-by-step explanation:
If a class has two responsibilities, according to the Single Responsibility Principle (SRP), we should indeed aim to separate these responsibilities into different classes. The SRP is one of the SOLID principles in object-oriented programming that states a class should have only one reason to change, meaning it should have only one job or responsibility. If a class has more than one responsibility, it could lead to a high coupling and harder-to-maintain code. Thus, encapsulating each responsibility within its own class can lead to more robust and adaptable code.For example, consider a ReportGenerator class that has methods both for generating reports and sending them via email. These are two distinct responsibilities - report generation and email transmission. The SRP would suggest that we should create two classes: one for generating reports, and another for sending them via email, to ensure each class has a single responsibility, thereby promoting easier maintenance and scalability within the software design.