Final answer:
It is true that if a fall protection plan does not use conventional systems, it must explain why these systems are impractical or more hazardous.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that a fall protection plan which deviates from conventional fall protection systems must document the reasons why the conventional systems are either infeasible or pose a greater hazard is true. In workplaces where there is a risk of falling, the establishment of a fall protection plan is crucial for ensuring the safety of workers. Conventional fall protection systems include guardrails, safety nets, and personal fall arrest systems. When these are not practical or potentially create more hazards, the alternative methods used must be documented in a fall protection plan. This documentation is important because it justifies the alternative measures and ensures that all safety concerns are addressed systematically.