Final answer:
The context for the term CGO in the statement about a 'causality instance involved in an attack' is unclear, precluding a definitive true or false response. CGO could be a misinterpretation of another acronym or terminology within cybersecurity, and without additional information or correct context, it is impossible to provide an accurate answer.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that only the CGO of a causality instance that is involved in an attack is terminated is ambiguous as it stands since it lacks the context needed to provide a factual response. In the realm of cybersecurity and cloud computing, the term CGO could refer to a Chief Governance Officer, or it could be a typo or misinterpretation of another acronym such as CGI (Common Gateway Interface) or CGNAT (Carrier-Grade NAT). Without the proper context or clarification of what CGO refers to, it is not possible to provide a true or false answer. If CGO refers to a role within an organization, the termination of a role based on an attack would be a policy decision and could potentially differ in each scenario.