Final answer:
The assertion that divine command and natural law are examples of teleological approaches is incorrect. Divine command theory falls under deontological ethics, and natural law is based on objective moral values discernible through reason, distinct from teleological consequentialism.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that divine command and natural law are examples of teleological approaches is false. Divine command theory is a form of deontological ethics, which suggests that actions are intrinsically right or wrong based on divine commands, independent of outcomes. In contrast, natural law theory, as proposed by Thomas Aquinas, posits that moral values are objective and based on the natural order, discoverable through reason and aligning with human nature.
Teleological ethical theories are consequentialist, focusing on the outcomes or goals of actions to determine their moral value. Examples of teleological theories include utilitarianism, which judges actions by the amount of happiness or utility they produce. Divine command and natural law both provide foundations for ethical conduct, but they are not defined by the consequences of actions, which is the hallmark of teleological ethics.