Final answer:
The statement is true; cognitive views of morality include both subjective and objective perspectives, such as moral realism for objectivity and moral relativism and skepticism for subjectivity.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that cognitive views of morality can be either subjective or objective is true. There are various philosophical positions that discuss the subjectivity or objectivity of moral principles. Moral realism posits that there are objective moral truths that exist independent of human opinion. Conversely, moral relativism and moral skepticism argue that morality is subjective and dependent upon individual or cultural perspectives. Additionally, the concept of telos suggests that objective moral values can sometimes be determined based on whether actions fulfill certain goals or purposes.
Discussions on whether morality is objective or subjective delve into the realms of metaethics, questioning the foundations upon which moral values are established. Beliefs regarding the objectivity of morality range from natural law theory, which assumes that morals are derived from nature and therefore objective, to views that consider moral claims as subjective social constructs that vary from society to society.