Question

How are ethical frameworks different than moral relativism/absolutism?

a) Ethical frameworks are objective
b) Moral relativism rejects universal moral truths
c) Moral absolutism allows for situational ethics
d) Ethical frameworks focus on cultural norms

Answer 1

Ethical frameworks are objective, while moral relativism rejects universal moral truths. Moral absolutism allows for situational ethics, and ethical frameworks focus on cultural norms.

Step-by-step explanation:

Ethical frameworks and moral relativism/absolutism are different in several ways:

1. Ethical frameworks are objective: Ethical frameworks provide a set of moral principles and rules that are intended to be applied universally, regardless of personal beliefs or cultural values. They focus on determining what is morally right or wrong based on logical reasoning and objective criteria.
2. Moral relativism rejects universal moral truths: Moral relativism views moral values as subjective and relative to individuals, communities, and cultures. It believes that there are multiple equally valid moral frameworks, and what is considered moral can vary from one culture to another.
3. Moral absolutism allows for situational ethics: Moral absolutism posits the existence of universal moral truths that are always applicable, regardless of the circumstances. However, it does acknowledge that there may be exceptional situations where certain moral principles can be temporarily suspended or overridden to serve a greater good.
4. Ethical frameworks focus on cultural norms: Ethical frameworks take into account cultural norms, but they go beyond them to establish a set of universal moral principles that can be applied across cultures and societies.