Final answer:
Morals are considered subjective and based on personal, familial, and cultural beliefs, leading to their potential rigidity and cultural dependency. Ethics, on the other hand, offer a systematic and adaptable framework that can encompass diverse cultural perspectives and are often built upon universal principles that seek to transcend individual subjectivity.
Step-by-step explanation:
When comparing morals to ethics, we find distinct differences. Morals are often seen as the personal values and beliefs held by an individual, shaped by their cultural, familial, and personal experiences, leading to their subjective nature. Conversely, ethics typically refer to systematic frameworks for deciphering right and wrong within a broader community or society, often employing philosophical theories and professional codes of conduct.
Ethics are sometimes considered superior or less inferior to morals because ethics provide a systematic approach in formulating behavioral guidelines across different contexts and cultures. Ethics draw upon universal principles or theories such as consequentialism, which looks at the outcomes of actions, care ethics, which focuses on the relationships and specifics of situations, and the categorical imperative, which posits that certain duties must be followed. Such frameworks tend to be more adaptable and cross-culturally relevant than personal morals, which can be rigid and limited to individual perspectives.
Furthermore, moral relativism illustrates that morals can differ greatly between cultures, hinting at their potentially subjective and culturally dependent nature. On the other hand, philosophers have attempted to establish ethical principles that transcend cultural boundaries, seeking a mediating path between moral absolutism and cultural relativism.