Question

Let's say that Professor Murck has submitted a paper to a scientific journal, on the topic of her research on mantle xenoliths. The journal editor has sent the paper to three scientists working in a similar discipline, asking them to read and comment on the paper. This is an example of:

a) peer review
b) scientific bias
c) anecdotal evidence
d) a controlled experiment

Answer 1

The scenario where Professor Murck's paper is reviewed by fellow scientists is known as peer review, which ensures the paper's quality and contribution to scientific literature.

Step-by-step explanation:

The process described where Professor Murck's paper is being assessed by three scientists working in a similar discipline is known as peer review. This is a critical part of scientific research dissemination, ensuring that the work meets the standards of the discipline and contributes new knowledge or insights. During peer review, qualified experts evaluate the paper for its validity, significance, and thoroughness. They critique the research's rationale, methods, statistical analyses, ethical considerations, and the conclusions drawn. The feedback provided helps to maintain the integrity and quality of scientific literature by only allowing research that is original, significant, and rigorously vetted to be published. The option from the question that accurately represents this is (a) peer review.