Final answer:
The outcome when a may_dirty session needs to be blocked is highly dependent on system specifics, but common actions might include triggering an alert, putting the session on hold, or attempting to transition to a clean state. Immediate termination is usually a last resort to prevent data loss. The term 'may_dirty' is not standard and should be understood within particular system context.
Step-by-step explanation:
When a may_dirty session needs to be blocked in a computing context, it generally means that the session that is in progress and has ongoing changes or operations that have not been completed or committed may need to be paused or managed in a specific way. However, without context about the specific system or application in question, it's difficult to provide a definitive answer. The terms 'may_dirty' and 'sesson' are not universally standard, and their meaning can greatly vary depending on the context, such as database operations, file I/O, or networking sessions.
In some systems, an alert or an error might be triggered (Option D), and in others, the session could be paused or put into a waiting state until it can be safely managed (Option B). The approach taken would depend on the system's design and the implications of interrupting a session that might be modifying data or performing important operations. Immediate termination of a session (Option A) could lead to data loss or corruption, so it is typically a last resort. Automatic cleanup or transition to a clean session (Option C) would represent a more sophisticated system that can handle such situations without manual intervention.
Since this is a specific scenario likely dependent on a particular technology or software, the terminology used ('may_dirty session') should be clarified within the context of the application or system documentation to understand the correct course of action.