Final answer:
The majority of states and the federal system use the subjective test for evaluating entrapment. For cases of racial discrimination, such as in college admissions, the strict scrutiny standard is applied. The Army Beta test was used for recruits who were not fluent in English.
Step-by-step explanation:
When evaluating entrapment, the majority of states and the federal system utilize the subjective test. This test focuses on the defendant’s predisposition to commit the crime. If the defendant was inclined to commit the crime without police persuasion, then entrapment is not a valid defense. Contrastingly, the objective test, which is used by a minority of states, focuses on the government's conduct rather than the defendant's predisposition.
Regarding the question concerning potential discrimination in a college admissions test, the courts would likely use the strict scrutiny legal standard. This standard is applied in cases involving a suspect classification, such as race, or a fundamental right. It requires the government to prove that the challenged classification serves a compelling state interest and is narrowly tailored to achieve that interest.
The test designed for Army recruits who were not fluent in English was the Army Beta test. This non-verbal test was developed during World War I to assess the abilities of recruits who could not engage with the language-reliant Army Alpha test.