Final answer:
A ruthless dictator should strategically choose a second-in-command who complements their leadership style. A loyal or strategic individual might be most appropriate, considering the nature of dictatorial power and the need for obedience and intellectual support without posing a threat to the dictator's authority.
Step-by-step explanation:
When a ruthless dictator is considering who to choose as a second-in-command, it would be strategic to select a person that compliments the leadership style of the dictatorship. The options presented are a loyal individual, a strategic person, a diplomatic individual, and a ruthless person. Considering the nature of a dictatorship, a loyal individual would keenly follow orders and uphold the absolute direction given by the dictator. A strategic person could provide the intellectual prowess to maintain power and address complex problems, while a diplomatic individual may manage international relations effectively. However, another ruthless person might pose a threat to the dictator's power, unless the shared ruthlessness operates under strict loyalty.In the spectrum of governmental leadership, it is useful to recognize figures considered as dictators in history or contemporary politics. Answering a related question, Kim Jong-Un is typically viewed as a dictatorial leader, given the absolute power he holds within his government. Additionally, reflecting on types of authority, dictatorial authority resides primarily in a leader, unlike traditional authority which is derived from customs and societal norms. Lastly, expressive leadership is often found in roles requiring significant interpersonal skills and the ability to motivate, such as the sales manager of a fast-growing cosmetics company or the director of a summer camp for chronically ill children. Leadership within a dictatorship would unlikely be described as 'expressive'; instead, it would align more with authoritative, or coercive methods to maintain control over the government and populace.