Final answer:
An 'Ineffective panhandler' would likely make the least amount of money among homeless panhandlers, while charisma, strategic methods, and eliciting sympathy can influence earning potential. Perceptions of poverty often impact our reactions to the homeless, with sympathetic views potentially leading to more assistance.
Step-by-step explanation:
When considering who among homeless panhandlers would make the least amount of money, the category 'd. Ineffective panhandler' indicates an individual who is likely not proficient at engaging with passersby or eliciting empathy, thus making this person the one who would potentially make the least amount of money. Charismatic beggars might garner more attention and financial support due to their personal charm and persuasive abilities. A 'Strategic panhandler' may use methods or locations that maximize their visibility or the likelihood of receiving money, and a 'Sympathetic individual' may draw donations from people who feel a sense of pity or compassion towards them. The concept of subjective poverty is intriguing because it suggests that how we perceive poverty can be influenced by our impressions or interpretations. This means that whether we see a homeless person as content or begging can affect our reaction and potential willingness to assist. Sympathy, cultural attitudes, and even our mood at the moment can play roles in determining how we view and respond to homelessness and begging.