Final answer:
The idea that sender-necessary costs might conflict with communication's function is linked to political science, emphasizing that resources like time and effort are considered costs. This notion intersects with economics, sociology, and the functionalist perspective in understanding the complex effects of technological exchanges on cultural and political landscapes.
Step-by-step explanation:
The concept that sender-necessary costs may conflict with the original function of communication is relevant to the field of political science. In the context of this discussion, costs are not limited to monetary expenses but include broader resources such as time and effort. These resources are integral to achieving certain outcomes like making informed decisions. This idea is explored in various fields, including economics where every choice is associated with a tradeoff and cost. It's also seen in the transfer of technology from developed to developing countries, where cultural and societal norms influence the agenda behind the technology exchange.
Considering the impacts of technology from a functionalist perspective, we can see how technology is supposed to serve a purpose free from political ideologies. However, the reality is that technology transfer often comes with an agenda that might influence local cultures and economies in less-developed nations. This is where political science also intersects with sociology, since the introduction of technology can be seen as a way of cultural colonialism or a means of improving the diffusion of information and economic conditions.