Final answer:
The truthfulness of the SDA loan applicants statement depends on the specifics of the program or lender. Lower interest rates and deregulation could increase loans in financial markets, colonists objected to taxation without representation, and the Panic of 1819 decreased trust in the Second Bank of the United States.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement regarding SDA loan applicants receiving funds from either the regular loan fund account or a special account set aside for SDA applicants cannot be verified as true or false without additional context or information on a specific program or policy that it is referring to. However, in some cases, special loan funds or programs are designated for specific groups, which may include SDA (Socially Disadvantaged Applicants) in a government or institutional lending context. Whether or not such funds are available would depend on the specific lender or program in question.
As for the financial market question, changes that could lead to an increase in the quantity of loans made and received could include lower interest rates, which make borrowing more attractive, or deregulation that makes it easier for banks to issue loans. For the colonists' objection to taxes, it is true that they objected more to the lack of representation in how taxes were decided and used, rather than the principle of taxation itself. The Panic of 1819, on the other hand, negatively affected the public's trust in the Second Bank of the United States, making the statement false.