Final answer:
The political standpoint advocating for mandatory voting is authoritarian because it entails enforcing citizen participation in the electoral process. This contrasts with libertarian and anarchist views, which prioritize personal freedom and minimal state enforcement, and with democratic systems, where voting is a right rather than an obligation.
Step-by-step explanation:
If you think voting should be mandatory, the political standpoint most associated with that view is authoritarian. This is because mandatory voting imposes a legal obligation on citizens to participate in the electoral process, typically enforced by the state with penalties for non-compliance. An authoritarian viewpoint often advocates for a strong central authority and individual subordination to the state, which aligns with the idea of compulsory participation in voting.
Anarchism, on the other hand, opposes any form of state-imposed authority and therefore mandatory voting would be contrary to anarchist principles. Libertarians emphasize personal freedom and minimal state intervention, so mandatory voting is typically not in line with libertarian ideals. A democratic system emphasizes the rights of citizens to choose whether or not to participate in voting.
Voting is an important type of political participation, and it's considered the primary way that people express their will. This perspective aligns with a democratic system where voting is a right but not an obligation. Individuals who feel strongly about personal liberty, including opposition to or support for mandatory voting, may identify with certain political identities or parties that correspond with their broader political ideology.