Final answer:
It's false that women are more likely than men to view conversations as power negotiations; conversational styles can vary individually. Women proved capable during wartime burdens, so statements to the contrary are false. Prior to the 19th Amendment, women were not considered full legal persons, which is true.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that 'Women are more likely than men to view conversations as negotiations of relative status and power' is false. It's generally suggested that men are more likely to view conversations this way, with a focus often on status and independence, while women tend to view conversations as ways to create connections and seek consensus. However, it's important to note that these are broad generalizations, and actual conversational styles can vary widely among individuals.
'Many women found themselves incapable of handling the burdens of war when their husbands and fathers went off to fight,' is broadly considered to be false. Women have consistently shown resilience and capability in managing home fronts, entering the workforce, and providing support in various capacities during times of war.
The notion prior to the ratification of the 19th Amendment that women were not considered a legal person on their own is true. Until the amendment was ratified in 1920, women were largely denied the rights and privileges that came with legal personhood, including the right to vote.