Final answer:
Without a diagram, we cannot determine whether angles ∠4 and ∠15 are congruent or supplementary. We need further context to apply theorems related to parallel lines and transversals.
Step-by-step explanation:
In the given scenario where line p is parallel to line q and line r is parallel to line s, the statement that needs to be proven is the relationship between angles ∠4 and ∠15. Whether these angles are congruent is based on the given information and the properties of parallel lines and the angles formed when a transversal intersects parallel lines. Since options B and C are given facts within the problem, they do not need to be proven. Option A suggests proving congruence, while option D suggests proving a supplementary relationship.
To determine the correct option, we would typically use theorems related to parallel lines, such as the Corresponding Angles Postulate, Alternate Interior Angles Theorem, or others, depending on the specific diagram and placement of angles ∠4 and ∠15. However, without additional context or a diagram to illustrate the positioning of these angles, we cannot confidently conclude which relationship, congruence or supplementary, needs to be proven between angles ∠4 and ∠