Final answer:
Frederick Douglass and Helen Keller both utilize figurative language and Christian allusions, yet they differ as Douglass uses dialogue to reflect social disparities, while Keller's narrative is internally reflective. Douglass's characters come alive through his depiction, driving the narrative with societal implications, while Keller's transformation is personal and introspective. These elements offer strategies for developing one's own literacy narrative.
Step-by-step explanation:
Comparing and contrasting the narrative styles of Douglass's account with Keller's, it can be found that both writers use figurative language and make allusions to the Christian tradition. An example of this is the phrase 'bread of knowledge' used by both to symbolize the nourishment that knowledge provides to the human spirit, similar to how bread sustains the body. Additionally, both accounts emphasize the transformative power of literacy and education.
However, there are distinct differences in the execution of their narratives. Frederick Douglass, who wrote during a time when slavery was yet to be abolished, often uses dialogue to showcase the stark social disparities of his time. His direct accounts and use of dialogue bring to life his interactions and the intrinsic injustice of slavery. This format not only makes his characters like Mr. and Mrs. Auld vivid, but also adds a dynamic layer to his narrative as it engages with societal structures directly.
On the other hand, Keller's narrative is more introspective, delving into her internal transformation and the personal significance of learning and literacy. Her language tends to be more reflective and less interactive with the external world, in contrast to Douglass's dialogue-driven narrative.
To create your own literacy narrative, drawing inspiration from Douglass's work can be valuable. Consider recalling and depicting influential people, vivid places, and significant events in a way that highlights the importance of literacy in your life, just as Douglass does. His tone, use of language, and commentary not only reveal his perspective but also underscore why literacy was paramount to him.