Final answer:
Continuous surveillance may make citizens feel their privacy is invaded, despite some feeling protected or becoming more cautious. The increasing prevalence of surveillance technology poses complex challenges to the balance between privacy rights and government protection efforts.
Step-by-step explanation:
When citizens are aware that they are being continuously watched, it can lead to a sense of privacy invasion. In a surveillance society, a trade-off between individual privacy and government protection becomes apparent. The increased footprints on the web have made online privacy an evolving issue, with governments seeking to regulate information for the safety of their residents.
Public attitudes towards privacy and surveillance vary, as individuals may prioritize their safety and security differently. Some may feel protected by the surveillance, while others may become proactive in safeguarding their privacy or change their behavior to take less risk. Continuous monitoring, notably by the use of technologies like drones, magnifies the complex relationship between maintaining civil liberties and ensuring security.
Statistics from the Pew Research Center indicate that a significant number of people are concerned about how companies and governments use their data, highlighting a widespread apprehension toward the implications of constant surveillance on personal freedom and privacy rights.