Question

The purveyors and aficionados of fast food may not have convinced Mr. Schlosser that it isn't poisonous dreck, but it would have been interesting to hear their best case and the author's rebuttal. As it is, his refusal to allow the other side even a few words in self-defense makes the book seem kiddish. Which criterion is Crossen using in this excerpt from A Culinary Wasteland to evaluate the book Fast-food Nation?

A. Logic
B. Use of support
C. Organization
D. Clarity of terms

Answer 1

Crossen evaluates 'Fast Food Nation' by Eric Schlosser based on the usage of support in the book, criticizing the lack of presented dissenting opinions and counterarguments.

Step-by-step explanation:

In the excerpt from A Culinary Wasteland, Crossen is critiquing Eric Schlosser's book Fast Food Nation on the criterion of Use of support (Option B). Crossen suggests that Schlosser's argument would have been stronger if he had presented the fast food industry's perspective to create a more balanced discourse. The criticism implies that Schlosser did not provide adequate rebuttal to the potential claims of fast food proponents, which could be seen as a failure to address counterarguments fully. This approach to critiquing suggests that inclusive research and presentation of dissenting opinions strengthen an argument by demonstrating rigorous consideration of all sides.