Final answer:
If Alaska was not an owner state, there would be several differences in daily life and governance. The economy would become more dependent on federal funding, local governance would have less autonomy, and Alaska may not experience increased industrialization.
Step-by-step explanation:
If Alaska was not an owner state, there would be several differences in daily life and governance. First, without ownership of its natural resources like oil and natural gas, the economy of Alaska would become more dependent on federal funding. This could impact the state's ability to support services and programs. Second, without ownership, local governance in Alaska would have less autonomy as decisions and funding would come from the federal government. Lastly, without ownership, Alaska may not experience increased industrialization as the state would not have the same incentives to attract and support industries.