Final answer:
Term limits for Congress and the President can enhance democratic representation, but may also limit experienced leaders. Political association with PACs should be regulated to prevent undue influence.
Step-by-step explanation:
Term limits for members of Congress and the President can have both advantages and disadvantages. Some argue that term limits enhance democratic representation by bringing fresh ideas and preventing elected officials from making legislative service their career. On the other hand, opponents argue that experienced leaders bring stability and expertise to the political system. A middle ground could be term limits that vary based on performance evaluations, allowing for a balance between new perspectives and experience.
Politicians associating with Political Action Committees (PACs) is a topic of debate as well. Some argue that political association with PACs should be strictly regulated to prevent undue influence from special interest groups on politicians. This would help ensure that politicians prioritize the interests of the American people over the interests of PACs. However, it is important to consider that PACs also play a role in supporting candidates and promoting their political agendas, so a complete prohibition may limit the ability of politicians to run effective campaigns.