48.1k views
2 votes
Which best reflects what Nozick and Aristotle would say about how we should distribute high-quality violins?

a) Nozick would argue for a merit-based distribution, while Aristotle would advocate for an egalitarian approach.

b) Nozick and Aristotle would both support an egalitarian distribution of high-quality violins.

c) Nozick would favor an egalitarian distribution, while Aristotle would emphasize merit and individual contributions.

d) Both Nozick and Aristotle would argue for a random distribution of high-quality violins.

1 Answer

6 votes

Final answer:

Nozick would favor an egalitarian distribution, while Aristotle would emphasize merit and individual contributions.

Step-by-step explanation:

Nozick would favor an egalitarian distribution, while Aristotle would emphasize merit and individual contributions when it comes to distributing high-quality violins.

Aristotle believed that political offices and societal roles should reflect wealth disparities, with both the wealthy and the less wealthy having the opportunity to become leaders. This suggests an emphasis on merit and individual contributions.

On the other hand, Nozick's principle of Distributive Justice would argue that a distribution is just if everyone is entitled to the holdings they possess under the distribution, which implies an egalitarian approach. Nozick's focus is on ensuring individuals have the freedom to acquire and keep what they have earned.

User Martin Muldoon
by
7.9k points