Final answer:
Nozick would favor an egalitarian distribution, while Aristotle would emphasize merit and individual contributions.
Step-by-step explanation:
Nozick would favor an egalitarian distribution, while Aristotle would emphasize merit and individual contributions when it comes to distributing high-quality violins.
Aristotle believed that political offices and societal roles should reflect wealth disparities, with both the wealthy and the less wealthy having the opportunity to become leaders. This suggests an emphasis on merit and individual contributions.
On the other hand, Nozick's principle of Distributive Justice would argue that a distribution is just if everyone is entitled to the holdings they possess under the distribution, which implies an egalitarian approach. Nozick's focus is on ensuring individuals have the freedom to acquire and keep what they have earned.