Final answer:
The question asks to compare and contrast Sonia Nazario's presentation of ideas in both a biography and an editorial by analyzing their structure, narrative approach, and portrayal of personal growth, all while using MLA citation and maintaining an objective voice.
Step-by-step explanation:
The student's question pertains to comparing and contrasting how Sonia Nazario presents similar ideas in a biography and an editorial. They are instructed to use relevant evidence from both types of texts and apply MLA guidelines to cite this evidence. One must carefully analyze these texts, paying close attention to their structure, the presentation of biographical narratives, and the ways in which personal growth is depicted.
In a narrative essay, you would focus on recounting events, possibly offering insights into someone's life experiences and the importance of personal growth. This is in contrast to a descriptive essay, which would deeply describe features, characteristics, and sensations. When comparing biographical and autobiographical narratives, one would need to consider how each text approaches personal growth and the implications of this on the narrative.
Planning the essay involves laying out a structure where conclusions grow out of analysis. Often, arguments will show how different texts handle similar themes in unique ways. In addition to establishing clear similarities, the essay will need to focus on the nuanced differences, illuminating understanding through juxtaposition.
When you can't interview the subject of a biography, you infer motivations by analyzing actions and behaviors. For example, if someone's actions improve after an apology, you could infer genuine regret. This deduction is crucial for supporting the analysis in the essay.
Essay writing on literary texts requires taking a stance, making an argument, and backing it up with support from the text. One's goal is to add a new view or understanding to something that may already be familiar to readers, rather than just repeating existing critical arguments.