151k views
0 votes
Which of the following aDarlene’s wild mustang jumped the extra-high fence of Darlene’s securely locked corral and ran onto next-door-neighbor Paul’s property, knocking over his 8-year-old daughter causing injuries. Paul’s lawyer argues that there is liability even though Darlene acted with all reasonable care and caution. This is called:re activities that give rise to strict liability?

A. a superseding event

B. assumption of the risk

C. contributory negligence

D. strict liability

1 Answer

4 votes

Final answer:

The situation described in the question relates to strict liability in law, which holds a person responsible for their actions regardless of their level of care or caution.

Step-by-step explanation:

The situation described in the question relates to strict liability in law. Strict liability holds a person responsible for their actions regardless of their level of care or caution. In this case, Darlene's wild mustang jumped the fence and caused injury to Paul's daughter. Even if Darlene acted with all reasonable care and caution, there may still be liability for the damages caused.

User Ghazala
by
7.1k points