27.0k views
1 vote
Jethro recently purchased a new coffee pot made by Sunrise Ventures. One morning, Jethro brews a pot of coffee. When he goes to pour a cup of coffee, the handle separates from the pot and the coffee pot falls to the ground. The pot shatters and hot coffee splashes on Jethro, causing severe burns on his feet and legs. An expert examines the coffee pot and determines that one of the screws needed to securely attach the handle to the pot was not included. Sunrise Ventures showed that they did everything a reasonable person would do to make sure enough screws were included, but despite their reasonable actions, the screw still went missing. How will the Court rule on the Torts case between Jethro and Sunrise Ventures? Why?

User Antoneta
by
8.6k points

1 Answer

5 votes

Final answer:

The Court will likely rule in favor of Jethro in the Torts case against Sunrise Ventures due to a manufacturing defect in the coffee pot.

Step-by-step explanation:

In the Torts case between Jethro and Sunrise Ventures, the Court will most likely rule in favor of Jethro. Although Sunrise Ventures showed that they took reasonable actions to ensure enough screws were included, the fact that one screw was still missing indicates a manufacturing defect. In product liability cases, manufacturers are typically held strictly liable for any defects in their products, even if they took reasonable precautions. Therefore, Sunrise Ventures will likely be held responsible for Jethro's injuries and have to compensate him for the damages.

User AnKing
by
8.4k points