Question

The district court for the District of Wyoming hears a negligence case under its diversity

jurisdiction. The traditional rule is that a negligence case is governed by the law of the place of
the injury. An old Wyoming Supreme Court decision applied this traditional rule. In analogous
cases, however, the Wyoming Supreme Court, has more recently applied a more flexible
approach, where it applies the law of the state with the greatest interest in the case. Although
the Wyoming Supreme Court has never applied this "interest analysis" directly to a negligence
case, intermediate courts have done so. In this case, the injury in this case took place in
Wyoming, but it is undisputed that California has the greatest interest in the resolution of the
case because both parties are citizens of California. What negligence law is the district court
most likely to apply?
a- Wyoming law
b- California law
c-Federal negligence law
d-The court may pick whichever law it thinks is best in this case

Answer 1

The district court is most likely to apply Wyoming law in this negligence case.

Step-by-step explanation:

The district court is most likely to apply Wyoming law in this negligence case. While it is undisputed that California has the greatest interest in the resolution of the case because both parties are citizens of California, the traditional rule is that a negligence case is governed by the law of the place of the injury. Although the Wyoming Supreme Court has applied a more flexible approach in analogous cases, where it applies the law of the state with the greatest interest, they have not directly applied this approach to a negligence case. Therefore, the district court is most likely to follow the traditional rule and apply Wyoming law.