Question

Jeff sues Karen for breach of contract, seeking $100,000 in damages. During trial, the judge

improperly prohibits Jeff from admitting evidence that would have helped to show breach of
the contract. The jury finds that Karen breached the contract, but it awards only $50,000 in
damages. If Jeff files a motion for new trial, which result is most likely?
a-The court will grant the motion because the judge made a process error
b-The court may grant the motion as to damages and use additur to make Karen pay more or have a new trial
c- The court will enter judgment in favor of Jeff
d- The court will deny the motion because there was no prejudice from the error

Answer 1

The court will grant the motion because the judge made a process error.

Step-by-step explanation:

The result of Jeff filing a motion for a new trial is most likely that the court will grant the motion because the judge made a process error. In this case, the judge improperly prohibited Jeff from admitting evidence that would have helped to show breach of the contract. By denying Jeff the opportunity to present this evidence, the judge made a mistake that affected the outcome of the trial. As a result, the court is likely to grant the motion for a new trial to rectify the error.