Final answer:
The effective strategy for delivering bad news is to avoid times when the receiver is already upset. The delivery should be empathetic, considering the receiver's ability to process the information, and avoid leaving them alone with the news over a weekend or choosing a time when you are not available for follow-up.
Step-by-step explanation:
Considering Timing in Delivering Bad News
When anticipating the delivery of bad news that will be personally upsetting to the receiver, choosing the appropriate timing is crucial. The strategy that shows effective consideration of timing is b. Avoiding a time when the receiver is upset about something else. This approach is considerate as it avoids adding stress to an already difficult situation for the receiver. It is important to be empathetic and understanding, ensuring that the delivery is done at a time when it can be properly processed.
In contrast, delivering the news right before the weekend may seem considerate, but it can lead to the individual dwelling on the news without the opportunity for immediate professional support. Additionally, choosing a time when the receiver will not be able to contact you is inconsiderate as it shows a lack of availability for follow-up discussions or support.
Beyond the timing, the approach should also be tactful and supportive. Crafting a diplomatic and persuasive response to criticism about the lack of hope in a message should involve acknowledging the concern, explaining the purpose and scope of your story, and possibly suggesting that while the story addresses serious issues, it is meant to provoke thought and discussion rather than providing a simplistic message of hope. The goal is to convey understanding and reaffirm the value of the story.