198k views
2 votes
Which of the following is not a good resource for deciphering musical interpretation marks?

a) Deduction
b) Music teacher
c) Guessing
d) Library

User Rohitmohta
by
7.6k points

1 Answer

2 votes

Final answer:

The library is not a good resource for deciphering musical interpretation marks. A music teacher or professional musician is a better source of guidance and insights.

Step-by-step explanation:

The correct answer is d) Library.

In the context of deciphering musical interpretation marks, the library is not a good resource. The library may have sheet music and books on music theory, but it may lack specific information on interpretation marks, as these marks can vary between different performances and interpretations.

To understand interpretation marks, it is best to rely on a music teacher or a professional musician who has expertise in the specific genre or piece of music. They can provide guidance and insights on how to interpret the markings in the score.

Guessing can be unreliable as it is based on assumptions and may not accurately reflect the composer's intentions.

Deduction can be helpful to some extent, but it is usually not enough on its own without the guidance of an experienced music teacher or musician.

User Kevin Machado
by
8.4k points