Final answer:
The government likely used a combination of rational and behavioral approaches in the decision-making process regarding the potential second Sydney airport.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question asks whether the government used a rational or behavioral approach to decision making in the situation of the potential second Sydney airport. The rational approach to decision making assumes that individuals will make choices that maximize their own self-interest based on objective analysis. On the other hand, the behavioral approach acknowledges that individuals may not always act in a rational, calculating manner, and instead considers the impact of emotions, biases, and social factors on decision making.
In the case of the potential second Sydney airport, it is difficult to say definitively whether the government used a rational or behavioral approach without more information. However, it is likely that a combination of both approaches were taken into account. The government would have considered the economic benefits of constructing a new airport, such as increased employment and tourism, using rational analysis. At the same time, they would have also taken into consideration the concerns and preferences of the community, which is an aspect of behavioral decision making.
Therefore, it is possible that the government used a rational approach in analyzing the economic implications of the second Sydney airport, while also considering behavioral factors such as public opinion and community preferences.