Question

Determine if the conclusion follows logically from the premises. Premise: No known perceptions are primary notions. Premise: All primary notions are innate ideas. Conclusion: No innate ideas are known perceptions.

A. Valid argument
B.Invalid argument

Answer 1

The conclusion 'No innate ideas are known perceptions' logically follows from the premises provided, making it a valid argument. This is based on the relationship established by the premises and an example of deductive inference where the truth of the premises guarantees the truth of the conclusion.

Step-by-step explanation:

To determine if the conclusion follows logically from the premises, let's break down the argument:

Premise 1: No known perceptions are primary notions.
Premise 2: All primary notions are innate ideas.
Conclusion: No innate ideas are known perceptions.

The conclusion asserts that if something is an innate idea, it cannot be a known perception. This conclusion directly follows from combining the premises. If primary notions are the same as innate ideas and no known perceptions are primary notions, then it logically follows that no known perceptions can be innate ideas either.

Given that the conclusion is a direct result of the relationship established by the premises, this argument appears to be a valid argument. This means that assuming the premises are true, the conclusion must also be true. This is the essence of a deductive inference, where the conclusion is guaranteed given the premises.